Input interpretation
![group 11 elements | thermal conductivity](../image_source/0915d7f439c4bc4a77238131b3254fc5.png)
group 11 elements | thermal conductivity
Results
![copper | 400 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) silver | 430 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) gold | 320 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) roentgenium | (data not available)](../image_source/44240266486c3c412f8ee00def54e846.png)
copper | 400 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) silver | 430 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) gold | 320 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) roentgenium | (data not available)
![group 11 elements | thermal conductivity | 400 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) (median) (based on 3 values; 1 unavailable)](../image_source/bf419471234b4aaf797eec22453563ce.png)
group 11 elements | thermal conductivity | 400 W/(m K) (watts per meter kelvin difference) (median) (based on 3 values; 1 unavailable)
Ranked values
![| | visual | ratios | 3 | gold | | 0.74 | 1 2 | copper | | 0.9 | 1.3 1 | silver | | 1 | 1.34](../image_source/a7d2e99b1a1e094ecd8a4d1b40edc5e5.png)
| | visual | ratios | 3 | gold | | 0.74 | 1 2 | copper | | 0.9 | 1.3 1 | silver | | 1 | 1.34
Unit conversions for median thermal conductivity 400 W/(m K)
![4 W/(cm °C) (watts per centimeter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/e8bbab00709add0a402c5434f138cdf8.png)
4 W/(cm °C) (watts per centimeter degree Celsius difference)
![400 W/(m °C) (watts per meter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/61fb373c4b57c6b4c0e4d2ab048fe4c3.png)
400 W/(m °C) (watts per meter degree Celsius difference)
![4 W/(cm K) (watts per centimeter kelvin difference)](../image_source/1cf40cb370fe5663ac6e4ad636d98b25.png)
4 W/(cm K) (watts per centimeter kelvin difference)
![4×10^7 erg/(cm K s) (ergs per centimeter kelvin difference second)](../image_source/39db806c499d520b3c0d56d2dc2a65cc.png)
4×10^7 erg/(cm K s) (ergs per centimeter kelvin difference second)
![19 BTU_IT in/(h in^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit inches per hour square inch degree Fahrenheit difference)](../image_source/108ead54b4df22abdcb1b04c1b5f7719.png)
19 BTU_IT in/(h in^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit inches per hour square inch degree Fahrenheit difference)
![230 BTU_IT ft/(h ft^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit feet per hour square foot degree Fahrenheit difference)](../image_source/bfab72e5f329a2e80c1d1a6797d03be1.png)
230 BTU_IT ft/(h ft^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit feet per hour square foot degree Fahrenheit difference)
![0.96 cal_th cm/(s cm^2 °C) (thermochemical calorie centimeters per second square centimeter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/a57a25ff9f80d450887d9bc90ce5634b.png)
0.96 cal_th cm/(s cm^2 °C) (thermochemical calorie centimeters per second square centimeter degree Celsius difference)
Comparisons for median thermal conductivity 400 W/(m K)
![≈ 0.93 × silver thermal conductivity ( ≈ 430 W/(m K) )](../image_source/737756c62818862d1ce31db305b71a2e.png)
≈ 0.93 × silver thermal conductivity ( ≈ 430 W/(m K) )
![≈ 1.2 × gold thermal conductivity ( ≈ 320 W/(m K) )](../image_source/8cf9f66b1072578ebe52389e19618850.png)
≈ 1.2 × gold thermal conductivity ( ≈ 320 W/(m K) )
![≈ 2.9 × carbon thermal conductivity ( ≈ 140 W/(m K) )](../image_source/8a7448315a0e02cdce6076f268b381c4.png)
≈ 2.9 × carbon thermal conductivity ( ≈ 140 W/(m K) )