Input interpretation
![arsenic | Vickers hardness](../image_source/4d16afbc42e7011373d9602909118ef6.png)
arsenic | Vickers hardness
Result
![1510 MPa (megapascals) (converted from Brinell scale)](../image_source/751508cc7ad6a8506b805a67cad3e587.png)
1510 MPa (megapascals) (converted from Brinell scale)
Unit conversions
![1.51 GPa (gigapascals)](../image_source/0baea1dfda308136f1d41a957e24b8a1.png)
1.51 GPa (gigapascals)
![1.51×10^9 Pa (pascals)](../image_source/9abd9e63c62245e335a9c8b39aa06e85.png)
1.51×10^9 Pa (pascals)
![1.51×10^9 N/m^2 (newtons per square meter)](../image_source/2ef2e15db2131bb5e5757e015de04290.png)
1.51×10^9 N/m^2 (newtons per square meter)
![14903 atm (atmospheres) (unit officially deprecated)](../image_source/db58f7569ef08c9ce1e76621b6c72e2a.png)
14903 atm (atmospheres) (unit officially deprecated)
Comparison as tensile strength
![≈ ( 0.015 ≈ 1/66 ) × theoretical tensile strength of a carbon nanotube ( ≈ 100 GPa )](../image_source/0cc75cba9c7733f3209e37b345941303.png)
≈ ( 0.015 ≈ 1/66 ) × theoretical tensile strength of a carbon nanotube ( ≈ 100 GPa )
Hardness comparisons
![harder than calcite (Mohs 3)](../image_source/9faa15812f28a51bf3cecd63dd68f56a.png)
harder than calcite (Mohs 3)
![softer than fluorite (Mohs 4)](../image_source/5eb8c835158c4a6c3855b7af0a9e2c86.png)
softer than fluorite (Mohs 4)