Input interpretation
![group 13 elements | thermal conductivity](../image_source/4c65221713a4db10c639cff0bdab3302.png)
group 13 elements | thermal conductivity
Summary
![median | 46 W/(m K) highest | 235 W/(m K) (aluminum) lowest | 27 W/(m K) (boron) distribution | | (based on 5 values; 1 unavailable)](../image_source/417d100d4a026c911893709b1636ddf3.png)
median | 46 W/(m K) highest | 235 W/(m K) (aluminum) lowest | 27 W/(m K) (boron) distribution | | (based on 5 values; 1 unavailable)
Entity with missing value
![nihonium](../image_source/9cb88911227a908a34d018abf3a491db.png)
nihonium
Ranked values
![| | visual | ratios | 5 | boron | | 0.11 | 1 4 | gallium | | 0.12 | 1.1 3 | thallium | | 0.2 | 1.7 2 | indium | | 0.35 | 3 1 | aluminum | | 1 | 8.7](../image_source/b8cb28a6684766582f597318283fe935.png)
| | visual | ratios | 5 | boron | | 0.11 | 1 4 | gallium | | 0.12 | 1.1 3 | thallium | | 0.2 | 1.7 2 | indium | | 0.35 | 3 1 | aluminum | | 1 | 8.7
Thermal conductivity rankings
![1 | boron | 27 W/(m K) 2 | gallium | 29 W/(m K) 3 | thallium | 46 W/(m K) 4 | indium | 82 W/(m K) 5 | aluminum | 235 W/(m K) (based on 5 values; 1 unavailable)](../image_source/eff0ff0eb450a9f11f1c39ab0c5bc9a4.png)
1 | boron | 27 W/(m K) 2 | gallium | 29 W/(m K) 3 | thallium | 46 W/(m K) 4 | indium | 82 W/(m K) 5 | aluminum | 235 W/(m K) (based on 5 values; 1 unavailable)
Unit conversions for median thermal conductivity 46 W/(m K)
![46 W/(m °C) (watts per meter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/a4e5a7cc8c1f666b6dca7337d2a34011.png)
46 W/(m °C) (watts per meter degree Celsius difference)
![0.46 W/(cm °C) (watts per centimeter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/6be2b00c9c32f1c87982f0f7d29b9118.png)
0.46 W/(cm °C) (watts per centimeter degree Celsius difference)
![0.46 W/(cm K) (watts per centimeter kelvin difference)](../image_source/f09da4be59f7862352d3430f96cafa01.png)
0.46 W/(cm K) (watts per centimeter kelvin difference)
![4.6×10^6 erg/(cm K s) (ergs per centimeter kelvin difference second)](../image_source/9ed062a8416a142b29059518bca4322f.png)
4.6×10^6 erg/(cm K s) (ergs per centimeter kelvin difference second)
![2.2 BTU_IT in/(h in^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit inches per hour square inch degree Fahrenheit difference)](../image_source/696160ea07a9478353daee090cef648f.png)
2.2 BTU_IT in/(h in^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit inches per hour square inch degree Fahrenheit difference)
![27 BTU_IT ft/(h ft^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit feet per hour square foot degree Fahrenheit difference)](../image_source/3191f62ea1b373862a97fae3775e4c2a.png)
27 BTU_IT ft/(h ft^2 °F) (IT British thermal unit feet per hour square foot degree Fahrenheit difference)
![0.11 cal_th cm/(s cm^2 °C) (thermochemical calorie centimeters per second square centimeter degree Celsius difference)](../image_source/396ad82457d20c229d3068c18c179b21.png)
0.11 cal_th cm/(s cm^2 °C) (thermochemical calorie centimeters per second square centimeter degree Celsius difference)
Comparisons for median thermal conductivity 46 W/(m K)
![≈ ( 0.14 ≈ 1/7 ) × gold thermal conductivity ( ≈ 320 W/(m K) )](../image_source/94142f19004b3a071913708509f0c702.png)
≈ ( 0.14 ≈ 1/7 ) × gold thermal conductivity ( ≈ 320 W/(m K) )
![≈ 0.33 × carbon thermal conductivity ( ≈ 140 W/(m K) )](../image_source/54a7315ddea4e066aa3375d56ffd616a.png)
≈ 0.33 × carbon thermal conductivity ( ≈ 140 W/(m K) )
![≈ 0.57 × iron thermal conductivity ( ≈ 80 W/(m K) )](../image_source/3b57488a42d43069cbcdc7ba1a53ed67.png)
≈ 0.57 × iron thermal conductivity ( ≈ 80 W/(m K) )